To the church in… (part 1)
So I’ve been reading a fair amount of Pauline epistles (which is a fancy biblical way of saying Paul’s letters, i.e. Colossians, I & II Thessalonians, etc…) and trying to garner some wisdom about the body of Christ, the church if you will, from these letters.
And initially it’s very interesting. Because the initial part of most of Paul’s letter looks like the following:
“To the church of God in Corinth, to those sanctified in Christ Jesus and called to be holy, together with all those everywhere who call on the name of our Lord Jesus Christ—their Lord and ours:” (I Corinthians 1)
“To the church of God in Corinth, together with all the saints throughout Achaia” (II Corinthians 1)
“To the churches in Galatia:” (Galatians 1)
“To the church of the Thessalonians in God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ: Grace and peace to you.” (I Thessalonians 1)
”To the church of the Thessalonians in God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ: ” (II Thessalonians 1)
Then Paul will write a greeting, like grace and peace be with you (it’s where I got my sign off if you care) and then he’ll start the main section of his letter. But as I studied this a few questions came to mind:
+Some introductions (Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians) are a little different and don’t (to the best of my understanding not knowing how to read Greek) contian the word church. Why not?
+Where did the word church originally come from anyway? Is it in the Old Testament?
+What was the cultural element that Paul was writing to? 50 people? A city’s worth? House churches? Buildings?
Thus of course all this begged further research and study: (and procrastination of other things like thesis work and school homework):
The Online Etymology Dictionairy defined the progress of the word “church” as follows:
church ![]()
O.E. cirice “church,” from W.Gmc. *kirika, from Gk. kyriake (oikia) “Lord’s (house),” from kyrios “ruler, lord.” For vowel evolution, see bury. Gk. kyriakon (adj.) “of the Lord” was used of houses of Christian worship since c.300, especially in the East, though it was less common in this sense than ekklesia or basilike. An example of the direct Gk.-to-Gmc. progress of many Christian words, via the Goths; it was probably used by W.Gmc. people in their pre-Christian period. Also picked up by Slavic, via Gmc. (cf. O.Slav. criky, Rus. cerkov). Romance and Celtic languages use variants of L. ecclesia. Slang church key for “can or bottle opener” is from 1950s. Church-mouse, proverbial in many languages for its poverty, is 1731 in Eng. (http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=church) Which Wikipedia reaffirmed as:
The term church originated from Greek “κυριακή” – “kyriake”, [1] meaning “of the lord” and later began to replace the Greek ekklesia and basilica within English-speaking Christendom, c. AD 300, though it was used by Christians before that time (Acts 20:17). The German word Kirche is also related to the same root. However, in other European languages, ekklesia prevailed such as in French église, Spanish iglesia, Portuguese igreja, or Italian chiesa. The Romanian word for church, biserică, derives from Latin basilica. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church#_note-0)
So, not a whole lot of help there, but there was one interesting point: In Greek writing there are different forms of the same English word (love is probably the most common example here, with the whole agape, eros, and phileo conundrum). So what form does Paul use when he writes his letters?
So thanks to biblegateway.com and an online translator (as well as Wikipedia again), I can state with limited assurance that Paul uses the word εκκλησια, which is ekklesia. (At least I saw that word perpetiated throughout the first verse of the Greek texts I was looking at).
This of course (in truest Rob Bell decontruction tactics) prompts more questions.
What does εκκλησια, ekklesia, even mean?
Have we lost part of the cultural relevance of the word?
and, how would the original hearer of the message (i.e. the people that the letters were written to) recieve this greeting?
But as for now, my office hour is over, and I need to go to go get some thesis work done (and eat). So more on this soon.
grace and peace (χαριτος και της ειρηνης)
a post best kept private
i almost posted an emotional rant. decided against it. somethings are best not shared on the internet
grace and peace
the Body…
Everyone has their soapboxes. That issue, idea, or rant that the person holds near and dear to their heart and will defend and proclaim vigourously to anyone who will listen. Usually friends will warn new listeners with a causual, “Oh, don’t get him started, he could talk about_____ all day…”
But the listener is interested nonetheless. Because the soapbox speaker speaks with passion. This issue (or whatever) is something the speaker has put much thought into. One such issue for me is the church, or moreover, the body of Christ.
I can easily recall at least half a dozen times when friends have come to me and confided in me that they are discontent with the way church is presently. Their complaints/concerns vary from the semi-noble ”this church isn’t doing enough service work,” to the understandable, yet unacceptable “i’m just not getting anything out of this,” to the common and frankly immature “i really just don’t like the music there.” They have unwittingly opened a can of worms. They have placed the soapbox in front of me and I have no choice but to stand on it and declare my message:
“Church is not about you.”
But it is. But it isn’t.
As I have attended ”church” for most of my life, I have gone through different phrases of what the word ”church” even means. there’s the physical definition, the church is a building. There’s the transidential definion, the church is the group of believers who meet together. Then there’s a host of other definitions as well. And we struggle with the semantics.
Because even though at times we acknowledge church to be more than a building and we acknowledge it as a group of people, we fail to ackowledge it as the Bible does, a Body. A connected unit that works in collaboration, suffers together, and rejoices together.
I’m slightly under-the-weather today. My throat is a little sore (again, don’t worry Mom, it got better, then came back it hasn’t been consistently sore…) And my nose is runny. And in turn my whole body aches a little. My whole body suffers with my nose and throat. Together.
And last night, a friend rubbed my shoulders. And it felt great. In fact the great feeling seemed to transcend my shoulders and make my whole body feel good. When one part is honored, all the other parts rejoice.
And when people decide to leave “church” for most reasons, they do themselves a disservice (usually-there are excpetions to this thought), and they do a disservice to the Body itself. It would be as if my shoulders left my body. And the rest of my body couldn’t celebrate with my shoulders any more.
That’s what I mean when I say church isn’t about you. Church cannot be a self-serving place, where solely our own needs our met and not the cares and concerns of our fellow believers or the world around us.
Now that Ephesians is wrapped up. I think I’m going to tackle a topical issue of the Body of Christ/Church. This coincides well with the book I have bee reading (the Shape of Things To Come) and has been something I have been meaning to study for a while.
I’ll keep you posted.
grace and peace
Facial Hair Awareness Campaign: Conan O’Brian
What do you do when your writers go on strike, grow a beard and get back on the air. That’s what Late Night Host Conan O’Brian did in order to keep his show on air. In fact Conan decided to pay his staff out of his own pocket.

So what does this tell us about facial hair??
One-facial hair is funny. Not funny like make fun of the person, but funny as in hey I’m one of the funniest people in America and I sport a beard.
Two-facial hair is characteristic of integrity. Check out what Conan said regarding his beard, “Conan explained that his fuzzy face came from a loving place. “I grew it out of solidarity for my writers, and to prove that I have some testosterone,” he said on his show, before (rightly) adding: “I know this looks fake. It looks like it ties on in the back.”"
Three-Facial hair is in-style. The more actors/comedians/politicians who support beards the better.
I consider this a great success for the FHAC.
Grace and Peace
You know you’re a dork when…
SO i decided to post on the fact that Cool Adam and I while working on various papers for school decided to synch our iTunes by hitting play at the same time to listen to Incubus’s “The Warmth” in surround sound on both our laptops.
And it does indeed sound sweet.
So yeah, we’re dorks…
On another completely unrelated note, I listened to MLK’s “I have a dream” speech today. Prolific!
And I finished Freakonomics today so expect a post on that sometime soon as well
Grace and peace
MLK: Letter from a Birmingham Jail
Go read this for Martin Luther King Day. It is amazing.
http://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html
Grace and peace
Book Review: Sex God by Rob Bell
Good Word.
I have become increasingly interested in Rob Bell’s message. My first introduction to Rob Bell was through the NOOMA videos, which are all incredibly well done. I then heard of Velvet Elvis, or rather I heard of the heresy of Velvet Elvis (which actually isn’t even close to heresy at all when you read it, but some people…). Time passed and I heard Bell speak in Cleveland, his “The Gods aren’t Angry” talk; captivated me for an hour and a half. I mused through Velvet Elvis on the CF return trip from Florida, and found a copy of Sex God around the Manastery and decided to pick it up, since it’s description intrigued me.
Sex God, apart from its provocative title, was a refreshing read that explores the link between spirituality and sexuality; the link between our bodies and our spirits. And how faith intertwines through it all.
Bell covers a variety of topics in a narrative fashion, touching on issues such as divorce, sex, rejection, lust, marriage, singleness, etc all the while illuminating the source of the issues through a diligent exegesis of Scripture. He pulls a lot out of Ephesians, tackles the infamous 1 Corinthians 7 passage, often refers to the marriage metaphors Christ uses, and uses a lot of Hebrew and Old Testament philosophy to highlight his points.
So I enjoyed it. I’ll do my best to present what I took from it:
- a beautiful reminder that we are all made in God’s image and that the whole of a person is to be respected, not a single facet to be lusted upon.
- insight into Biblical masculinity opposed to other definitions of manhood.
- a better understanding of why commitment is good.
I garnered more than just those 3 bullets, but it’s hard to summarize post-mod literature and I have other things to do tonight, so I will leave the analysis of the book up to you, good reader.
Grace and peace
Recent Going on’s
So school has started and life has once again taken on a schedule (which is great for my productivity!!) Here’s some recent happenings and just an overview of what my last semester looks like!
+Teach: I’m teaching Calc with Business Applications again! So I get to recycle all my lesson plans, quizzes, and tests. Ironically I am teaching in the JAR in a room I had for a class my freshman year. So I am ending my career at Akron in the same room I started my academic career in. I don’t know my class that well yet, but it seems promising.
+Class: I have one, Advanced Numerical Analysis II, which shouldn’t be as bad as I thought it was (ANA I was a beast, but the two classes cover different material and II looks to be a little easier, as we are only doing direct methods, not iterative methods…) Plus one of my friends is in the class with me so we should be able to work together some.
+Thesis: This will be the bane of my semester. I have a feeling I’m going to be working my tail off on this.
+I went to hear Dr. John Perkins last night at Mt. Olive Baptist church in West Akron. He spoke on racial reconciliation and unity within the church. And although his talk was similar to the one I heard two years ago (and by similar I mean essentially the same) it was still an ebcouraging time to see so many people of the Akron area (Knute, Judge Burnam, JDH & house, Duanne Crabbs, other church pastors, etc) gathered together for such an event.
+I started a book study on “The Shape of THings to Come” with a couple of friends. It looks to be vary promising and challenging. The book talks about the look of the church in a missional sense. Interesting stuff, but I only read the first chapter thus far. (I’m sure it will prompt a post sooner or later)
+I’ve almost finished reading Freakonomics and Sex God so I plan on posting on those soon.
+Mission Year: This is what I’m doing next August for a year. I plan on putting up some more information about this program as well, as well as some pertinent links and what not.
+Plus I should have at least one more Escapades in Ephesus shortly, (I have been delyaing the whole armor of God thing, because it, well its kinda cliche’ in Christian culture now,but I plan on listening to some sermons on it and reading some commentaries then posting my thoughts and reflections.)
So good stuff en route, stay tuned
Grace and peace
Escapades in Ephesus: Part V- “Walk”
I use more gas in 4 weeks of break then I use in 3 months of semester. Especially Christmas break, when it’s cold outside and walking places can be trying. But when the semester comes around I walk everywhere. Class, work (which is teaching a class), church, friends houses. I usually walk (or ride my bike, but walking goes along with the theme tonight, so let’s just roll with it).
So after driving to the Ley’s house for an amazing dinner (thanks!!) and driving back. I showered and then continued to read “Sex God” by Rob Bell. (a book that I serendipitously picked up while cleaning the Manastery, matched exactly where I was at, and in true Nooma form I entitled this blog entry “Walk” in order to obey the strict {or not so strict} post-modern naming rule of all Nooma videos and Rob Bell related ideas) Bell mentioned Ephesians quite frequently in his book. I was pleasantly surprised.
And he catalyzed a lot of themes that I had been noticing in Chapters 4 and 5 of Ephesians, but had here to for (which is a great connecting phrase by the by {another one!!}) been veiled in mystery to me. And the main idea that I garnered: walk.
And as much fun as driving is, i do truly love walking places. I love being within walking distance of downtown Akron, campus, church, friends. And I love going to those places. Because much of the time walking is about a destination. Where we are walking to, but there are times when a walk is more than a destination. I took a walk with a friend of mine who was in town (we actually walked all the way to the Northside and ate at the Vegeterranean {new organic-vegeterian restaraunt in Akron} and it was quite delicious!)
and we didn’t care so much about where we were going, but the time we spent together getting there. Catching up. Laughing and sharing. Seeing how the great city of Akron had changed. There’s a lot to be said about the way one walks (just ask Aerosmith and Run DMC)
Or you could ask Paul,
***This is from the Holman Christian Standard version of the Bible, so a little different from NIV here…
Ephesians 2:1-2 “And you were dead in your trespasses and sins in which you previously walked according to this worldly age, according to the ruler of the atmospheric domain, the spirit now working in the disobedient.”
Ephesians 2:8-10 “For by grace you are saved through faith, and this is not from yourselves; it is God’s gift— not from works, so that no one can boast. For we are His creation—created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared ahead of time so that we should walk in them”
Ephesians 4:1-2 “I, therefore, the prisoner in the Lord, urge you to walk worthy of the calling you have received, with all humility and gentleness, with patience, accepting one another in love, diligently keeping the unity of the Spirit with the peace that binds [us].”
Ephesians 4:17-18 “Therefore, I say this and testify in the Lord: You should no longer walk as the Gentiles walk, in the futility of their thoughts. They are darkened in their understanding, excluded from the life of God, because of the ignorance that is in them and because of the hardness of their hearts.”
Ephesians 5:1-2 “Therefore, be imitators of God, as dearly loved children. And walk in love, as the Messiah also loved us and gave Himself for us, a sacrificial and fragrant offering to God.”
Ephesians 5:8 “For you were once darkness, but now [you are] light in the Lord. Walk as children of light”
Ephesians 5:15-16 ” Pay careful attention, then, to how you walk—not as unwise people but as wise— making the most of the time, because the days are evil.”
And it’s clear that Paul is talking about the way you live, but yet he chooses to use the expression walk (or so I’m told, apparently in the Greek it’s literally “walk,” but you may find it translated in the NIV as “live”). And what’s great about these passages is what’s between them. Application. The how-to’s of walking.
Speak the truth. Do not steal, but build and give back. Don’t get drunk on wine, rather be filled with the Spirit. Be kind and compassionate. Don’t talk crudely, but give thanks. Sing and make music in your heart. This is how you ought to walk.
There’s a lot of depth here. More than I can express in this blog. But there is one thing I feel pertinent to note. Our walk is a unique one. Unique in the idea that both the walk and the destination are the same. We walk with Christ, by Christ, through Christ (I am the gate, I am the way, I am the Shepherd) and He is also our destination. He is the end to what we have journeyed for!
grace (most excellent and un-understandable grace) and peace
Escapades in Ephesus: Part IV- A Great Mystery
I fully expected not to write everyday as I suggested I might in an earlier post. However I did not expect that my lack of blogging would be from trepidation. I fully expected myself to be lazy and not want to process thoughts (and to some extent this was true), however I was caught off guard by fear when I began processing thoughts.
Fear of being exceedingly vulnerable on a website that is open to all. Fear of actually forcing myself to evaluate myself and recollect my thoughts. So I did what I usually do when I’m a little “iffy” on a subject, idea, or thought: I went out to Camp Carl for a night.
I took my roommate Cool Adam and we went out to essentially help watch a college group that was having a class at Camp Carl during the week (during the off-season {or retreat season as Landis prefers}, many diverse groups come to camp for a myriad of reasons). It was really not work at all, simply a turning off of lights and a locking up, which gave us plenty of time to listen to sermons, read our Bibles, and confide in each other.
I went to two weddings over the last couple of weeks. Moreover, I was just in two weddings over the past couple weeks. That means that two close friends of mine have just had their lives changed in a dynamic way!
And I usually like to talk about how I love weddings: how they remind me of the bride and groom and Christ and the Church; which Paul writes about in Ephesians and he calls it a great mystery, that is Jesus and the Church! Or how I love the reminder of purity that the bride represents as she walks down the aisle in white, expectant and joyful. Or how weddings usually inspire within me the call to lead well as a man. And how much I love dancing at weddings and free, delicious food (albeit the latter is not as serious, but just as valid).
And all those things were true. I did remind myself and remember those things (and danced and ate it up). But…
but,,,
but (and here I am trying to blog but finding no words)
but, there was something that sat at unease within me. An apprehension, a trepidation, a great mystery that I couldn’t understand.
I recently (around the time last Fall semester ended) met a newly-wedded wife at a Chapel Christmas concert. My friend asked her how marriage was and she responded by stating that marriage was great, she was learning a lot, she felt it was the most sanctifying thing ever…
And immediately my theological knife was out and I retorted without love that it was unfair to call marriage the most sanctifying thing ever. That her statement implied that those who were single could never reach a level of sanctification or Christ-likeness that those who are married could achieve.
She was taken aback, and I quickly realized my own, well, “jerkness,” laughed it off, and promptly changed the subject. (I have apologized to her since.)
But why, why was I so theologically hostile? Although I do believe my theological point to be true, I find that it wasn’t a matter of theology at all, rather it was an emotional apprehension.
And still, I find my words short to adequately express to you what I feel/think. Am I simply jealous of my friends? Not really. Am I called to a life of singleness? I don’t think so. It’s just that at this present point in my life I find this “great mystery” of Christ and the church expressed through a bride and groom, all the more mysterious and unknown to me.
And I don;t know what to make of that.
More to come.
Grace and peace